Unlike submitted Support help tickets, System Change Requests (SCR's) can only be submitted through your organization's appointed and authorized ELMS CCB member representatives, or otherwise if no CCB representatives have yet been appointed, your Primary Information Owner appointee. If you are unsure of who your organization's appointed ELMS CCB member representatives or Primary IO are, you may email the ELMS Support team to request that information:
To learn more about the process, please visit our CCB Responsibilities and Meetings page. Below you will find all SCR's that have been submitted, and what their status is. To download a blank form, you may visit our Reference Library and download the SCR Form.
Utilize the search filters below to narrow your results by keywords, module, or state. You may also request an Excel file of all the SCR data by contacting the Help Desk.
| Found: 1779 Result(s) | Show: |
| Title |
ELMS Module |
Reporting Org |
State |
Description |
Action |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02196 | Gear Size Tracking Enhancements | Warehouse | USMC | New | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
1. Gear Size Tracking EnhancementsRequirement ID: ELMS-REQ-003a Requirement:ELMS shall include a new field labeled “Actual Size” to record the size determined through physical fitting or self-assessment at the time of gear allocation.Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-003bRequirement:
ELMS shall retain or create a separate field labeled “Issued Size” to capture the actual gear size provided to the Marine, regardless of fitting outcome.
2. Data Export Schema UpdatesRequirement ID: ELMS-REQ-004Requirement:
ELMS shall include the Actual Size, and Issued Size fields in all relevant data exports and reports to support downstream analysis and performance audits.
3. Analytical Reporting CapabilityRequirement ID: ELMS-REQ-005Requirement:
ELMS shall support reporting functions that display gear issuance and destruction trends by EDIPI and UIC, and highlight discrepancies between Actual Size and Issued Size to enable gear fitment analysis and improve forecasting accuracy.
4. Data Integrity and Validation Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-006Requirement:
ELMS shall enforce validation on the EDIPI, UIC, Actual Size, and Issued Size fields to ensure compliance with format standards and controlled vocabularies, and shall reject incomplete or improperly formatted entries.
Mission Critical:
Benefits:
Frequency:
Monthly
Users:
Materiel Managers
WH Managers
ICP
|
|
| 02195 | Add Remarks Field to Individual Issue | Warehouse | USCG | New | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
There is not a Remarks field available during the Individual Issue process.
Recommended:
Add Remarks field to issue details grid for Individual Issue. Also map the remarks field to the Member Sales Financial Report grid so that the remarks are visible when the user runs the member sales report.
Mission Critical:
Benefits:
Having a remarks field could benefit all users utilizing ELMS because it would allow users to capture additional non standard data during the Individual Issue process. Specifically, UDC would like to use this field in order to enter Company data for the companies that are visiting the distribution center for issuing.
Frequency:
Weekly
Users:
This change could benefit all ELMS users that do individual issuing.
|
|
| 02194 | Update GFM-A Account Manager Role | Warehouse | USAF | New | Change Request: New Role Design
Description:
AF GFM-A Account Manager role users are unable to access the ICN Inquiry screen from the Inventory Inquiry screen in ELMS Warehouse Module. When the users click on the stock number link, they receive an error message. Recommend adding Read access to ICN Inquiry screen to the GFM-A Account Manager role to 1) view the ICN Inquiry screen and 2) prevent the user from receiving the error message.
Recommended:
Add Read access to ICN Inquiry screen to the GFM-A Account Manager role
Mission Critical:
Not a new role design, but a modification to the existing GFM-A Account Manager role.
Benefits:
This provides the ability to financially report DAF CICP OM&S assets to GAFS-R using the DAF approved valuation methodology.
Frequency:
Weekly
Users:
All current and future users of the Warehouse module in support of AF GFM-A CICP effort.
|
|
| 02193 | OM&S Financial Reporting using LAC | Materiel Management | USAF | New | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
DAF CICPs need ELMS to enable OM&S financial reporting using the Latest Acquisition Cost (LAC) methodology. This is the valuation method selected by the DAF for CICP managed OM&S spare parts. LAC should replace the current Moving Average Cost (MAC) valuation method sent to GAFS-R from the ELMS ICP module. Each ELMS catalog entry will contain a data element identifying the valuation methodology. PDC 1510 will add a data element to the 832N transaction for the valuation methodology. ELMS will need to update their 832N processing for PDC 1510 once its approved. For the existing stock numbers, ELMS will need to update all type asset code = ‘O’ stock numbers in the AF CMP GFP catalog to add the new data element from PDC 1510. ELMS will need to add support for a new Accounting Transaction that will be used to report the revaluation of existing inventory to the LAC. For DAF, this will need to be translated into a Bid Number (new one to be assigned) for GAFS-R reporting. Solution needs to be in place to turn on financial reporting in FY26.
Recommended:
Recommend that ELMS Materiel Mgmt., Catalog, and Accounting services to support the add the LAC valuation methodology to enable financial reporting (replacing MAC), add a data element to the catalog to identify the valuation methodology of OM&S, update the 832N processing for compliance with ADC 1510, update AF CMP GFP catalog with new data element to enable financial reporting, update accounting to support the accounting of OM&S using LAC and for the revaluation of existing inventory to LAC, and implement new bid code GAFS-R.
Mission Critical:
DoD 7000.14-R Volume 4, Chapter 4 2.4.2.3 / SAFFAS 3. Latest Acquisition Cost (LAC). LAC assumes the latest acquisition
inventory cost for all existing stock of the same product, regardless of older purchase prices. When
applying the LAC valuation, management periodically revalues the inventory and establishes an
allowance account for the unrealized holding gains and losses associated with ending inventory.Benefits:
This provides the ability to financially report DAF CICP OM&S assets to GAFS-R using the DAF approved valuation methodology.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This requirement enables the automation of financial reporting for the 100+ DAF CICPs to GAFS-R in addition to providing ELMS users with the option to report OM&S at the Latest Acquisition Cost.
|
|
| 02192 | M&U Cannibalization | MU | AvSE | New | Change Request: New System Process
Description:
When an ordered part from ILS-S is delayed, maintainers may cannibalize a part from another asset to meet mission requirements. However, there's currently no way in ELMS to transfer the document number for the ordered part to a different Work Order.
Recommended:
Please add a new Cannibalization screen to enable the transfer of a document number between Work Orders. Enforce remarks section to properly document the approved action.
Mission Critical:
Department of the Air Force Instruction (DAFI) 21-101 Para 11.13
Benefits:
To properly satisfy an existing supply requisition and to meet priority mission requirements.
Frequency:
Monthly
Users:
This change will be applicable to 15,000+ users assigned to Site FH-AFHAF
|
|
| 02191 | Time Zone Update | MU | AvSE | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
Two to three times a year users overseas are experiencing issues related to Daylight Savings Time which causes them to have to insert dates as one day in advance to correctly show the correct date. This causes issues for inspection due dates, Asset Next Maint Dt, Asset Last Maint Dt, as well as reporting when closing maintenance work orders. A standard time that does not change would alleviate these issues.
Recommended:
Create a toggle, or feature flag, at the Maintenance Program level to give OPR(s) the ability to change the system to read Greenwich (Zulu) time. Once selected, the times recorded in ELMS will switch from the current time zones to Zulu time, which is a standard time zone for DoD personnel.
Mission Critical:
Benefits:
With the Time Zone as a single, non-changing time, this will standardize reporting across the Enterprise, or those whom choose to enact it, alleviating the constant recurring bug fix requests that get reported to ELMS Support.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
All overseas users are affected by this.
|
||
| 02190 | Maint Asset Activity Inquiry | MU | AvSE | New | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
Within the M&U module, it is not possible to see asset history in as much detail as other modules. It is not possible to see who profiles an asset, or if an asset is re-profiled it is not possible to see when the change was made or by whom.
We have to ask the ELMS service desk to look back at keystrokes to see who made the change and when.
Recommended:
In inquiries add an Asset History option, the searchable fields should include date from, date to, asset id, Maint Activity, Last Updated By, Last Updated Date.
The selectable fields should include the same as the Searchable fields at a minimum, as well as all the fields available in the Maintenance Asset Master.
The results should highlight any changes made (like ELMS does in the Asset Activity inquiry in PA), who made the changes, and on what date. Mission Critical:
DAFI 21-101, DAFI 21-103, AFTO 00-20-1, AFTO 00-20-2
Benefits:
This will allow users in the field to look up and see what changes were made to their assets on their own and will cut down on tickets submitted to the ELMS Help Desk for historical data in M&U. This will also allow the DAF ELMS FMO to better assist users without having to reach out to the ELMS Help Desk.
Frequency:
Weekly
Users:
All ELMS M&U users will be affected.
|
|
| 02189 | Speed to Release | Warehouse,Materiel Management | USMC | New | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
ELMS currently lacks the ability for Warehouse Managers to upload and mass process lists of required items for Materiel Release Orders (MROs). Each NSN and quantity must be entered and executed individually, creating an inefficient, error-prone process that delays materiel movement, increases manpower burden, and reduces responsiveness to urgent operational requirements. Without a Speed to Release capability, ELMS cannot meet the Marine Corps’ expectations for rapid, scalable, and accurate logistics support in a contested operating environment. Failure to implement this capability creates a significant deficiency in ELMS: the system cannot efficiently support large-scale deployments, surge requirements, or time-sensitive missions that demand immediate bulk materiel release. This gap undermines ELMS’s ability to achieve its core mission of improving end-to-end logistics readiness and risks stakeholder confidence in the program’s modernization efforts. By closing this gap, the Marine Corps will gain a faster, more reliable, and policy-compliant release process that enhances both operational readiness and long-term ELMS success.
Recommended:
To support the design, development, and validation of the proposed Speed to Release capability, a detailed requirements list has been prepared and is included as Attachment A to this Business Requirements Document. The file, titled "GAP 106_BRD_ELMS_USMC_MARCORLOGCOM_1.b Speed to Release Requirement Listing", provides a structured breakdown of all functional requirements aligned to PMI standards. Each requirement is organized by process category, description, step number, and requirement ID, and is written as a testable “shall” statement to ensure traceability, compliance, and clarity for developers, testers, and program managers. This attachment serves as the authoritative baseline for system design and future enhancements related to the Speed to Release functionality.
As the foundation for defining the Speed to Release capability, the business process flow titled GAP 106 _BRD_ELMS_USMC_MARCORLOGCOM_1.b Speed to Release_v1.2 20250903_Process Flow is included as Attachment B to this package. This document captures the step-by-step operational sequence for initiating, validating, and executing materiel release orders within the ELMS Warehouse Module. It provides the process logic that guided the identification of functional requirements and ensures that system development aligns with established Marine Corps logistics workflows, DLMS compliance, and the policy objectives outlined in MCO 4400.201 W/CH-3. The process flow will serve as a critical reference point for developers, testers, and program managers to validate that the new functionality supports accurate, efficient, and policy-compliant warehouse release operations. Mission Critical:
Benefits:
Frequency:
ADHOC
Users:
Materiel Managers
WH Managers
ICP
|
|
| 02188 | SKO Exemption - Condition Code G | Warehouse,Materiel Management | USMC | New | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
Acquire to Retire (Equipment): L1 Bring into APSR
The ELMS Warehouse Management (WM) model incorrectly reassigns the Condition Code of a Principal End Item (PEI) to “G” (Unserviceable – Incomplete) whenever a required Child NSN is not present in the Sets, Kits, and Outfits (SKO) configuration. While appropriate in some cases, this auto-reassignment creates systemic errors when applied to ICP-controlled warehouses, where assets must retain the Condition Code assigned by the accountable Warehouse DoDAAC. This misalignment disrupts key workflows: PEIs inducted into Depot Maintenance must remain in Condition Code “F,” and those exiting Depot rebuild must be issued as Condition Code “A” regardless of whether collateral Child NSNs are recorded. If not corrected, this defect will cause inaccurate inventory reporting, disrupt Depot Maintenance inductions, and undermine Marine Corps property accountability. Erroneous downgrades to Condition Code “G” risk misallocation of maintenance resources, reduce asset visibility accuracy, and introduces a Significant Deficiency within the ELMS system. Request all warehouse DoDAACs assigned to an ICP, by Owning DoDAAC, be exempted from the SKO auto reassignment of Condition Code “G” process.
Recommended:
GAP107-001 (Functional). The system shall exempt all Warehouse DoDAACs tied to an ICP Owning DoDAAC from automatic reassignment of Condition Code 'G' during SKO assembly/disassembly processes.
GAP107-002 (Functional). The system shall retain the Condition Code assigned by the Warehouse DoDAAC when the PEI is processed under an ICP-controlled structure.
GAP107-003 (Functional). The system shall allow Warehouse personnel to manage Condition Codes through normal receipting, COSIS, and condition reassignment processes without system override.
GAP107-004 (Functional). The system shall prevent auto-conversion of Condition Code 'F' PEIs being inducted into Depot Maintenance processes.
GAP107-005 (Functional). The system shall ensure all PEIs exiting the Depot rebuild process are assigned Condition Code 'A' regardless of missing or unrecorded Child NSNs.
GAP107-006 (Functional). The system shall continue to validate Child NSNs marked as 'Required' within the SKO catalog when not under ICP-controlled warehouses.
GAP107-007 (Functional). The system shall apply Condition Code 'G' reassignment only when the Warehouse DoDAAC is not linked to an ICP structure and the PEI is missing one or more Required Child NSNs. GAP107-008 (Functional). The system shall provide configuration controls to distinguish between ICP-controlled DoDAACs and non-ICP warehouses.
GAP107-009 (Functional). The system shall enforce that all exemptions are logged and auditable to maintain FIAR compliance.
GAP107-010 (Functional). The system shall maintain compatibility with DLMS standards (DoD 4000.25) for Condition Code reporting and updates. GAP107-011 (Technical). The system shall update the ELMS data model to include an attribute identifying Warehouse DoDAACs linked to an ICP Owning DoDAAC.
GAP107-012 (Technical). The system shall apply existing business logic to standard (non-ICP) warehouses without disruption.
GAP107-013 (Technical). The system shall generate error messages when ICP exemption logic fails (e.g., incorrect ICP assignment, missing configuration).
GAP107-014 (Technical). The system shall prevent reassignment of Condition Code 'G' if the DoDAAC-to-ICP linkage cannot be confirmed, defaulting to current assigned Condition Code until resolved.
GAP107-015 (Technical). The system shall log all Condition Code assignment or exemption actions for audit review.
Mission Critical:
Benefits:
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
Materiel Managers
WH Managers
ICP
|
|
| 02187 | Exceptions Data - DLMS 940R(A5E) | Warehouse,Materiel Management | USMC | New | Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
ELMS does not currently ensure consistent capture and transmission of ad hoc shipping instructions using the NTE segment within DLMS 940R/A5E Materiel Release transactions. These instructions, which include special delivery notes (e.g., “SHIPMENT TO BE SENT 3RD PARTY”), must accompany the MRO and be visible on both the outbound transaction and the DD Form 1348 release document. Current limitations prevent full compliance with DLMS Implementation Convention (ADC 1472), reducing the system’s ability to support operational flexibility and accountability when exceptions arise. This gap is assessed as a Significant Deficiency. Without the ability to reliably include and propagate ad hoc shipping instructions through the NTE segment, ELMS risks misrouted or delayed shipments, improper handling or disposal of materiel, and incomplete audit trails. The absence of this capability undermines Marine Corps supply accountability, increases reliance on manual workarounds, and places ELMS at risk of failing to meet enterprise-wide DLMS compliance and operational readiness requirements.
Recommended:
GAP108-001. System shall provide users the ability to enter ad hoc shipping instructions in the DLMS 940R/A5E using the NTE segment with qualifier 'DEL'.
GAP108-002. System shall allow up to 12 repeats of the NTE segment, each supporting up to 30 characters, for a maximum of 360 characters of ad hoc shipping text.
GAP108-003. System shall map user-entered ad hoc instructions to the correct NTE segment in the DLMS 940R/A5E transaction and ensure compliance with X12 formatting rules.
GAP108-004. System shall make NTE segment ad hoc shipping instructions available for printing on the DD Form 1348 release document.
GAP108-005. System shall ensure NTE segment ad hoc shipping instructions are linked to the Materiel Release Order (MRO) record for traceability.
GAP108-006. System shall ensure all stakeholders (ICP, Storage Activity, Transportation) can view ad hoc shipping instructions transmitted via the NTE segment. Mission Critical:
Benefits:
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
Materiel Managers
WH Managers
ICP
|
Disclaimer | Accessibility