Unlike submitted Support help tickets, System Change Requests (SCR's) can only be submitted through your organization's appointed and authorized ELMS CCB member representatives, or otherwise if no CCB representatives have yet been appointed, your Primary Information Owner appointee. If you are unsure of who your organization's appointed ELMS CCB member representatives or Primary IO are, you may email the ELMS Support team to request that information:
To learn more about the process, please visit our CCB Responsibilities and Meetings page. Below you will find all SCR's that have been submitted, and what their status is. To download a blank form, you may visit our Reference Library and download the SCR Form.
Utilize the search filters below to narrow your results by keywords, module, or state. You may also request an Excel file of all the SCR data by contacting the Help Desk.
| Found: 1779 Result(s) | Show: |
| Title |
ELMS Module |
Reporting Org |
State |
Description |
Action |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00881 | Manual return | Warehouse | USMC: CSP | Done | Description Recommended Mission Critical Benefits Users |
|
| 00880 | UIF Reconciliation | Warehouse | USMC | New | When conducting a Unit Issue reconciliation when the RO signs the reconciliation the signature is not captured in a receipt for the reconciliation. ?Also you should be able to print out the Outstanding returnable Items sheet and this sheet should have a spot at the bottom right of each page to put the RO's Initials and the last page should have a signature spot. ?This way they can attach the sheet to the reconciliation. Recommended solution:?Recommend that a reconciled receipt be added to the Unit Issue Activity reconciliation Tab that captures the RO signature, digitally, to show that the RO's CMR has been properly reconciled and signed. ?Also, recommend an ability to print out an Outstanding returnable Items sheet in PDF that has an area at the bottom right of every page for the RO's initials and a signature line at the end of the last page. ?By using a PDF file it helps prevent manipulation of the data contained within. | |
| 00879 | Inventory Update Manager for Serialized Gear | Warehouse | USMC: CSP | Done | Description Recommended Mission Critical Benefits Users Completed - Release 5.0 - 03 February 2017 |
|
| 00876 | CIIC restrictions | PA | Navy | Removed | Description Recommended
Mission Critical Benefits Users 07Nov2018 – cancelled per Kevin Callahan |
|
| 00875 | DoDAAC Validation | PA | Leidos | New | Description Recommended Mission Critical |
|
| 00874 | IUID Loan to Contractor Business Rule Update | PA | Leidos | New | There is a Business Rule within the IUID Registry processing that requires the Delivery Order Nbr (Sub Contract) to be included when the Purchase Order Nbr contains a A, D, or G ?in the 9th position. ?Failure to include the Delivery Order Nbr results in the transaction being ?rejected. Recommended solution: Modify the Contract AUD process to require the Delivery Order Nbr when Contract Use Cd = "G" (Contractor GFP) and include the Delivery Order Nbr in the Asset Transfer feed to a Contractor via iRPT, and in the IUID interface when the Contractor is using DPAS as their APSR and in the return of the asset to the government from the contractor. | |
| 00873 | DPAS IUID Registry Response File Import | OUSDDPAS | Leidos | New | Create and configure a GEX/DLA TS channel to receive IUID response files that are currently being published but not being routed to DPAS. IUID has implemented a response file for batch submissions. ?This is the methodology for obtaining errors and the reasons why something was not successfully process by the IUID registry. ? Very few, if any of the errors being reported by the IUID Reigistry are user correctable. ?Most are related to unknown schema changes or new Business Rules (BRs) implemented by the IUID Registry that DPAS was either not aware of or is due timing of Releases of the 2 systems. Recommended solution:?In order to support the DPAS Batch IUID Submission interface, DPAS needs to develop processes to accept the Response file and to process the data contained within the Response File into a format that enables the DPAS Support team to review/analyze so adjustments can be made prior to the re-submission of the failed transactions. ? | |
| 00872 | WAWF Pending Table | PA | DISA LOG EIS | Done | Currently DPAS has no way to know what site id/UIC to assign to a particular WAWF record when it is received. ?I think it reads the UIC/DODAAC reference table and retrieves the first UIC that it hits with a matching DODAAC. ?This is not always correct. Recommended solution:?In the pending process allow users to add the outstanding contract/delivery order information and populate a WAWF due in table. ?When transactions are received that match the contract/delivery order, you will know what site id/UIC that contract belongs to. ?If user's do not enter the data and you don't find a match on contract/delivery order you can run it thru the current DPAS logic.
Completed/Marked Done per email from Mr. Stossel - 11 June 2021 |
|
| 00871 | Pending Process | PA | DISA LOG EIS | New | When receipt transactions are loaded to the pending table from WAWF it is difficult and time consuming to find the assets that you need to retrieve. ? There isn't an asset id/stock nbr/custodian nbr assigned yet - since the assets are not in DPAS - the Doc Nbr is not helpful, nor is the UII. ?We would like to retrieve all assets purchased on a particular contract or delivery order, however those fields are not available for receipt processing. Recommended solution:?Add contract/purchase order nbr and delivery order number to the search criteria field in the asset management pending transaction process. | |
| 00870 | Mass Upload CIP IMPV and Ancillary Cost | OUSDDPAS | DISA LOG EIS | New | Currently for the CIP asset process, Improvement process and Ancillary Cost process, there is no way to add multiple records. ?We often have to spread Improvement/Ancillary costs to 20-30 assets and they have to be entered one asset at a time. Recommended solution:?Use the new feature in the receipt process - mass upload to add records to CIP asset, Improvement and Ancillary Cost. ?The CIP asset spreadsheet would only need to include Serial Nbr. If there are 50 assets with the same make/model, they could all be added with one transaction. ?For the Improvement and Ancillary Cost process, since the asset record that they are tied to have to already be in DPAS, you would only need the bar code and the Improvement cost or the Ancillary cost amount on the upload spreadsheet. ?All other accounting data would only need to be entered one time. |