System Change Requests Header

Unlike submitted Support help tickets, System Change Requests (SCR's) can only be submitted through your organization's appointed and authorized ELMS CCB member representatives, or otherwise if no CCB representatives have yet been appointed, your Primary Information Owner appointee. If you are unsure of who your organization's appointed ELMS CCB member representatives or Primary IO are, you may email the ELMS Support team to request that information: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

To learn more about the process, please visit our CCB Responsibilities and Meetings page. Below you will find all SCR's that have been submitted, and what their status is. To download a blank form, you may visit our Reference Library and download the SCR Form.

Utilize the search filters below to narrow your results by keywords, module, or state. You may also request an Excel file of all the SCR data by contacting the Help Desk.

Found: 1779 Result(s) Show:

Title
ELMS Module
Reporting Org
State
Description
Action
02186 UIC & EDIPI added to reports for individual gear issues Warehouse USMC New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
 
1. Lack of EDIPI in Data Export Gap: Inability to uniquely identify individual Marines receiving gear. Impact: Hinders traceability of gear usage, replacement, and destruction rates at the individual level. Business Risk: Commanders and program managers lack insight into per-Marine gear life cycle and accountability, impeding informed decision-making and audit readiness.
2. Missing or Incomplete UIC Field Gap: Inability to associate gear issuance and destruction data with specific units. Impact: Prevents MEF commanders from assessing gear distribution and attrition trends across units. Business Risk: Creates blind spots in unit-level readiness and undermines logistical planning, potentially leading to over- or under-supply scenarios.
3. Single "Size" Field Without Differentiation Gap: Conflation of actual fitted size and issued size. Impact: Prevents accurate analysis of gear fitment and effectiveness of the sizing process. Business Risk: Leads to inaccurate forecasting, increased returns, and unnecessary reorders—resulting in higher costs and reduced Marine satisfaction.
 
Recommended:
 
1. Unique Identification of Marines Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-001Requirement:
 
ELMS shall include a mandatory EDIPI field in all gear issuance and gear destruction records to uniquely identify the individual Marine associated with the transaction.
 
2. Unit-Level Traceability Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-002Requirement:
 
ELMS shall include and populate the UIC field in all gear issuance and destruction records to associate each transaction with the appropriate unit.
 
3. Gear Size Tracking Enhancements Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-003aRequirement:ELMS shall include a new field labeled “Actual Size” to record the size determined through physical fitting or self-assessment at the time of gear allocation. Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-003bRequirement:
 
ELMS shall retain or create a separate field labeled “Issued Size” to capture the actual gear size provided to the Marine, regardless of fitting outcome.
 
4. Data Export Schema Updates Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-004Requirement:
 
ELMS shall include the EDIPI, UIC, Actual Size, and Issued Size fields in all relevant data exports and reports to support downstream analysis and performance audits.
 
5. Analytical Reporting Capability Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-005Requirement:
 
ELMS shall support reporting functions that display gear issuance and destruction trends by EDIPI and UIC, and highlight discrepancies between Actual Size and Issued Size to enable gear fitment analysis and improve forecasting accuracy.
 
6. Data Integrity and Validation Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-006Requirement:
 
ELMS shall enforce validation on the EDIPI, UIC, Actual Size, and Issued Size fields to ensure compliance with format standards and controlled vocabularies, and shall reject incomplete or improperly formatted entries.
 
7. Data Security and Compliance Requirement ID: ELMS-REQ-007Requirement:
 
ELMS shall store EDIPI and other PII in compliance with DoD cybersecurity standards, including encryption at rest and in transit, audit logging, and role-based access control in accordance with NIST SP 800-53.
 
Mission Critical:
 
 
Benefits:
 
 
Data will enable better modeling of demand leading to  more satisfied customers. Better modeling of demand from both usage and sizing will unlock significant savings in an organization this large.

Frequency: 
Monthly

Users: 
All USMC Users
02185 Modify the Stock Nbr Inventory Inquiry Warehouse USCG New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
There is a Show Due In checkbox on this report, but it does not function in an ideal way. The default sort shows inventory successfully brought to record. We need to be able to run a report that shows what the cost value is of “unreceived” based on incomplete or yet-unfinished receiving documents.
 
Recommended:
We would like for only the due ins to be displayed when this checkbox is selected. We would then benefit from a column option that calculates the order cost of the assets not yet received – a simple multiplier of the unit price or order price and the due in qty.
 
Mission Critical:
 
 
Benefits:
The ability to see the cost value of inventory not yet received.

Frequency: 
Monthly

Users: 
The number of users that would be benefit from this change at this time is roughly 8, but it can increase as we continue implementation efforts with the Coast Guard.
02184 Update Member Sales Transaction Report Surcharge Visibility Warehouse USCG New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
 
The current Member Sales Transaction report only displays the surcharge/tariff amount for a single item, regardless of the quantity issued. For example:
If a ball cap is issued for $20.08, the report shows a surcharge of 0.10.
However, if 3 ball caps are issued, the report still only shows $0.10 as the surcharge, requiring users to manually calculate the correct total surcharge ($.0.30 in this case)
This creates inefficiency and increases the likelihood of manual calculation errors.
 
Recommended:
 

Add a new column to the Member Sales Review transaction report that displays the total surcharge/tariff amount applied for the full quantity issued.

Make the surcharge column a default column instead of having to select it from the grid options
The report should automatically multiply the per- item surcharge by the total quantity issued.
The new column will reflect the total surcharge applied for the transaction line item.

Users will have a clear, accurate view of total surcharge values without needing to perform manual calculations.

 
Mission Critical:
 
 
Benefits:
 
 
Users will have a clear, accurate view of total surcharge values without needing to perform manual calculations which is important for audit-ability and accuracy.

Frequency: 
Daily

Users: 
The number of users that would be benefit from this change at this time is roughly 8, but it can increase as we continue implementation efforts with the Coast Guard.
02183 Cost of Inventory Report Warehouse USCG New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
 
Uniform Distribution Center (UDC) needs a report to show the total value of all stock on hand for the entire warehouse like the one attached from their current Integra system. The Unit Cost should represent the 'cost' of the goods.  The report needs to be made available within the Materiel Mgmt and Warehouse Mgmt applications.
 
Recommended:
 

The report should contain the following criteria filters: Grand Total by Type Asset Code and Grand total of all.  Select specific Stock Nbr(s) to display in report.  The report should provide for all warehouses, or for specific selected warehouses. For equipment, it should be the actual cost as the Unit Cost, and for OM&S, it should be the actual cost paid using the Moving Average Cost methodology to determine the current on hand cost.  When displaying specific Stock Nbrs, the report should display Stock Nbr, Item Desc, Serial Nbr, Lot Nbr, Condition Cd, Qty, Unit Cost and Total Cost. Add a Stock Status Report to the Real-Time Reports tab in the system.  When displaying specific Stock Nbrs, include Qty On Hand

 
Mission Critical:
USCG has a requirement to know the cost of their inventory for financial purposes.
 
Benefits:
 
 
This change would allow UDC to obtain a dollar value of the stock on hand.

Frequency: 
Monthly

Users: 
This report will not only benefit USCG, but all ELMS users.
02182 Improvement to Issue Receipt for Tariff Warehouse USCG New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
 
Currently, tariffs/surcharges that are applied to items are not reflected on the Issue Receipt and are slightly misrepresented at the conclusion of an individual/unit issue – via the Member Sales Review detail grid. This creates confusion for members and staff when reviewing receipts, as the true breakdown of item cost versus surcharge is not transparent.
 
Recommended:
 

Update the Issue Receipt format to add the applied tariff/surcharge to the total transaction cost. For example, if the item cost is 100.00 and there is  a 2% tariff. The total cost on the hand receipt should be $102.00.

When an item is issued, the receipt will clearly show:
Total transaction cost (item cost +tariff/surcharge). The tariff should only be seen by the Supply Unit, not the customer.
If multiple quantities are issued, the tariff line item should reflect the total surcharge amount for the full quantity.

For Individual Issue – on the header, there needs to be a tariff flag or a tariff percentage field so that the stated tariff placed against the stock item record is applied to the assets being issued – this should then be data available across any “issue activity” report or inquiry.

 
Mission Critical:
 
 
Benefits:
 
 
Elimates confusion for members reviewing receipts and shows the true breakdown of item cost versus surcharge.

Frequency: 
Daily

Users: 
Currently, this change would only impact roughly 8 users however the USCG is new to ELMS. This change has the potential to impact all USCG users and other agencies that use the tariff/surcharge function.
02181 Automation of DMR Capability PA,MU,Warehouse USMC New
Description:
 
The Enterprise Logistics Management System (ELMS) currently lacks the visibility, traceability, and audibility necessary to properly capture, validate, and certify Deferred Maintenance & Repairs (DM&R) data. This data is congressionally mandated and must be reported in accordance with Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) 42, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-136, and the DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoD 7000.14 R). DM&R figures are a required supplemental information (RSI) disclosure in the Department of Defense's (DoD) annual financial statements and directly impact the audibility of the DoD's end-of-year (EOY) reporting. 
 
Recommended:
 

FR1: – The system shall provide a mechanism to auto-update Work Order (WO) State Code or indicator check block within each of the three areas: Property Accountability (PA), Maintenance & Utilization (M&U), or Warehouse. For COSIS, the indicator shall be in the Warehouse module. For DM&R, the indicator shall be in the M&U module. System shall allow a user to check a 'DMR' or 'COSIS' block when deferring work orders.

 
FR2: – ELMS shall create a dashboard entry for both DM&R and COSIS that consolidates data across modules and presents total outstanding deferred actions for leadership visibility.
 
FR3: – ELMS shall create a method to retrieve the total cost of deferred orders for BOTH hours (time) and materials (money). This should be system-generated and reconcilable to financial reporting outputs.
 
FR4: – ELMS shall establish a Maintenance & Utilization (M&U) role for Custodian-RO-RI to enable oversight and accountability of DM&R and COSIS identification, flagging, and reporting.
 
FR5: – ELMS shall, in the WO statuses automatically updated for deferred WO State Codes. This prevents deferred work from being prematurely closed or excluded from financial reporting.
 
                                                         Compliance Alignment
 
The proposed SCRs align ELMS functionality with federal financial management requirements:
 
- **SFFAS 42**: Requires disclosure of DM&R as part of Required Supplemental Information (RSI).
 
- **OMB Circular A-136**: Establishes reporting format and requirements for RSI, including DM&R.
 
- **DoD 7000.14-R, Volume 6B**: Prescribes financial reporting policies and procedures for RSI disclosures, requiring accurate and auditable reporting of DM&R.
 
Implementing these SCRs will ensure ELMS can support the accurate capture, validation, and reporting of DM&R and COSIS data, strengthening DoD audit readiness and meeting statutory reporting requirements.
 
In 2018, DM&R reporting across DoD systems was effectively zero dollars. By Q3 of FY2025, reported DM&R obligations and estimates exceeded $26 billion. This rapid growth underscores both the materiality of DM&R reporting and the heightened audit risks associated with inaccurate or incomplete capture of data. Without a systemic mechanism in ELMS to automatically identify, flag, and aggregate deferred work orders (WOs) and Care of Supplies in Storage (COSIS) requirements, the Department risks failing to comply with congressional mandates, audit findings, and statutory financial reporting requirements.
 
                                                                             Key Facts
 
- DM&R is a congressionally mandated reporting requirement under SFFAS 42.
 
- OMB A-136 requires inclusion of DM&R as Required Supplemental Information (RSI) in agency financial statements.
 
- DoD 7000.14-R Volume 6B prescribes financial reporting requirements, including supplemental disclosures.
 
- From 2018 ($0 reported) to Q3 2025 (>$26B reported), DM&R grew significantly in scope and financial materiality.
 
- Current ELMS architecture does not provide sufficient mechanisms to automatically track, flag, and reconcile deferred maintenance and COSIS data.
 
                                                                PMCS Cost Capture
 
9,overall cost per month and year Individual repair parts used, Labor hours and rates, and Other material costs.
 
10. ELMS shall aggregate PMCS cost data by:Equipment type, Unit/DODAAC, and Fiscal period.
 
11. The cost data shall be available for reporting in both tabular and chart formats.
 
12. The cost tracking function shall integrate with the DMR dashboard for consolidated visibility.
 
Mission Critical:
SFFAS 42, OMB Circular A-136, and DoD 7000.14-R, Volume 6B
 
Benefits:
 
 
This will enable users to properly budget and quickly understand the readiness of its fleets.

Frequency: 
Daily

Users: 
All USMC users
02180 DoDAAC Inquiry TAC Type Field PA,MU,Warehouse,Materiel Management,FSM,Registry (SA/LW) SOCOM New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
DoDAAC Inquiry page under the 'TAC Type' field is confusing users on the Shipping Address. First line (TAC1) reads 'Std Address (Ship To / Bill To). Second line (TAC2 the Shipping Address) shows 'Freight / Bulk Item. Third line (if applicable) shows 'Bill To' which is correct, no change needed.
 
Recommended:Switch the TAC Type for the first & second line. Change the second line TAC Type to 'Ship To' for clarity.
 
Mission Critical:
Improves Accuracy and Accountability.
 
Benefits:
Better understand for all users when conducting a DoDAAC inquiry of where the materiel should be shipped to.

Frequency: 
Daily

Users: 
All USSOCOM Users.
02179 Merge Security and Admin Role Types PA,MU,Warehouse,Materiel Management,FSM,Registry (SA/LW) Leidos New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
Base upon the last few year of EY audits, there is no need to separate Admin and Security roles since they are both elevated roles.  Merge the Security and Admin roles types prior to start of next audit season.
 
Recommended:
Rename the Security role to 'System Management'. Move all roles currently assigned to the Administrator role to the new System Management role (3 to 2). Then drop the Administrator role (role key 3). Update documentation with the consolidated role name.
 
Mission Critical:
This will simplify managing elevated users, allows for easier promotion for temporary 'security' management without losing access to the admin screens, and standardizes our role types while keeping least privilege SOD.  
 
Benefits:
Simplify role types for elevated users for ICAMS upgrade, simplify elevated user management in SIPR and Standalone environments with less personnel, reduce management overhead.
 
Frequency: 
Quarterly

Users: 
This will effect personnel whom manage user accounts.
02178 Additional ServiceNow Endpoints PA DISA New
Change Request: Process Improvement

Description:
 
DISA issues and maintains IT equipment to a large customer base that is required to be inventoried on a reoccurring basis. The majority of the customers do not have the personnel to conduct these inventories or the amount of IT equipment they manage is too large to complete in a timely manner. Additionally, by the time the inventory is completed, the fidelity of the data captured has deteriorated.
 
Recommended:
Develop additional endpoints to retrieve data to ELMS from ServiceNow.
 
Mission Critical:
 
 
Benefits:
 
 
By implementing this solution, each piece of IT equipment issued to the customers, captured in ServiceNow, would reflect in ELMS with an updated inventory date. Therefore, significantly reducing the resources required to conduct an inventory.
 
Frequency: 
Daily

Users: 
The estimated number of users is at around 100k.
02177 Reconfigure ELMS - LMP interfaces for Transaction Date Enterprise Army New
Change Request: Policy / Regulatory

Description:
 
SFIS Compliance Issue: During LMP's last SFIS compliance assessment from JITC, LMP was informed that the SFIS T5 attribute (transaction date) was not compliant because LMP was receiving it in a 5-character Julian Date from ELMS/DPAS.
 
Recommended:
 

JITC states that the interfaces from ELMS/DPAS to LMP should be modified/re-configured so that the SFIS T5 attribute is received in the SFIS compliant 8 character YYYYMMDD format.

 
Mission Critical:
This effort is to remediate a Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC)-issued SFIS Compliance finding against the LMP - ELMS/DPAS interfaces:
JITC NFR LMP-INT-07: Change to inbound DPAS Interface INF00195 (Inbound DPAS Capital Asset Depreciation) ; and
JITC NFR LMP-INT-08: Change to inbound DPAS Interface INF00206 (Inbound SPS Post asset related transactions to the LMP System)
 
Benefits:
 
 
Implementing the proposed SFIS attribute T5 format change will remediate two JITC issued NFRs against the LMP - ELMS/DPAS interfaces, thus helping Army to downgrade the associated Material Weakness.
 

Frequency: 
Monthly 
 
Users: 
This ELMS/DPAS SCR request is tied back the the LMP tickets: INC0632358 and INC0632372

×