Description
Currently the CIP process does not allow you to enter the Obligation Document Number - this is where we store the MIPR Nbr that funds the CIP project.
Currently, when the X819 is generated DPAS moves the Reg Doc Nbr into the Ob Doc Nbr field because there isn't one on the record.
The Ob Doc Nbr field is the most important accounting field and needs to be on the CIP project, so that when costs are added, the accounting transaction is posted against the correct MIPR.

Recommended
Add Ob Doc Nbr to the cost tab within the CIP Add/Update/Delete and move the value of the Ob Doc Nbr to the accounting transaction when it is created.

Mission Critical
This is mission critical - our accounting interface partners have to manually correct the accounting transaction every time we increase a CIP project. We normally receive monthly AP increases to every CIP project that is currently open, so every month FMLO is required to manually change accounting records.

Benefits
This change will result in accurate financial reporting and will reduce time/cost of manually having to intercept and update an automated accounting interface.

Users
This will affect all users that have capital CIP projects

Completed - Release 5.2 - 29 September 2017

Requesting the ability to complete the user access forms on-line, transfer the form to DPAS and have the ability for DPAS to create the user account. Document attached with details of requested change. Requestor - Wendy Bormann 19 November 2013

Inventories closed via a Mass Update process has inherent vulnerabilities associated with the process in as much as it is possible to open inventory and then mass close the inventory without appropriate Inventory documentation. ?The Asset Management and Inventory Inquiry Modules to not provide the ability to run and extract a report by Inventory Process Code with the granularity necessary for Management Control Review testing/analysis. Customer priority: 2

The Maintenance Inquiry for Asset Utilization needs to have the ability to search on both the History and History Remarks fields. Currently these options are only available from the Fields selection. This requires exporting the data to Excel and searching for the Remarks and History Remarks you?re looking for. The Army uses these fields to enter critical information and is requesting this change. Joe Stossel comment, 2/24/2015 -?This would cause a scan of the database because the history field has no indexes and is a large unformatted field. Joe Stossel comment, 8/9/2015 -?work when SCR 643 is worked.

Description: Prior to this request DPAS had upgraded the Forms and Report module to allow the user to select multiple custodian reports however the upgrade did not address the accessibility for users to print multiple reports from their selections. Problem: In the Forms/Reports module the user can only print individual Hand Receipts, there is no option for the user to select multiple Hand Receipt for print. Improvement: Provide feature to allow the user the option print multiple hand receipt. Customer priority: 3

Description
When doing an inquiry in Asset Management > Manufacturer / Asset we need to be able to see the Custodian Numbers that the records are associated with.

Recommended
Proposal is to add Custodian Nbr to the Field selection Screen for output to an excel spreadsheet.

Mission Critical

Benefits
The records can be under various custodians, it is time consuming having to look up each asset id to find the Custodian Nbr that owns them. If the Custodian Number was a field that could be selected for output it would save our users time.

Users
Certain Users

Completed - Release 5.2 - 29 September 2017

Description
Proposal is to add 1 new field to the Field Selection Screen.

Recommended
Field to add is: Yr Svc Life (specific to the Improvement not the original building)

Mission Critical
Daily use

Benefits
Improve accuracy of reporting improvements for Real Property

Users
Affects certain users

Note: As part of SCR 00923 - add Reason Cd to the Improvement Process.

Completed - Release 5.0 - 03 February 2017

Description
Allow for mass transfer of government owned property instead of an item by item (based on asset ID). Currently the process entails each item be individually moved, this is a time consuming task that should be available as a single transaction.

Recommended
Create a means whereby the transfer of multiple items (if placed in a dedicated location or hand receipt, or via a stock number search can be mass transferred to a contractor as GFP.

Mission Critical
As Agencies are turning over control of GFP to contractors it is imperative that the action be done in the most expeditious manner.

Benefits
This process reduces time/cost since it would require less of each on the past of the Accounting Officer. This process would also improve accuracy/accountability since all of the property is being accessed onto the database at the time of acquisition and would reduce errors in the process.

Users
Transfer of GFP should affect users across all DPAS customers

Completed - Release 3.0 - 15 May 2015

Description: Currently, the AIT Label format can be only created at the UIC level. For Navy we have several Major Commands (Actbl UIC) that are organized in a regional framework. Under this framework the UIC is the Region and the custodian represents commands under the region. Here the custodian is a stand along UIC and asset ID?s are created at the custodian level. Recommend ability to create an AIT label at the custodian level. Customer priority: 1