Description
On the Work Order Basic Tab, the Est Service End Dt is driven by the receipt date in conjunction with the selected priority cd of the work order. If the W/O is past due upon selecting an approval date, an error message is given stating the est service end date must be => the approval date. The est service end dt has to be changed by M&U supervisor which negates the original priority cd given.

Recommended
The M&U user should not be able to change the Estimated Service End Date

Mission Critical

Benefits
Improves/Accuracy/ Accountability

Users

Joe Stossel comment, 8/10/2015 -work with 684 and 706 to ensure they agree.

07Dec2018 – cancelled per Deric Sims
No longer needed due to past enhancements.

Work Orders are coming over to M&U with a W/O Reason of Prep For Shipment without a prep for shipment cd. We can force them to select one, have one of the selections No Prep for Shipment, agency or user preference setting. Customer priority: 3

Description
During ADHOC testing of the DPAS-WM we attempted to perform an inventory gain as if for the purposes of having found an item during a directed inventory. The DPAS WM will not allow for the user to add material to the system other than through the receipts process. There are cases where it is DOD order to add material for other than receipted for reasons.

Recommended
The system must have the functionality to add material via the Inventory manager update process for gains associated with physical inventories. The lack of functionality on this end forces the user to ad the material via receipt only, which puts out a different SCS transaction than what is required.

Mission Critical
Yes, without this functionality DPAS-WM users will have to perform receipt transactions for gains associated with a physical inventory. While there is functionality to get the material in the system, this violates USMC policy on physical inventory.

Benefits
This update makes the DPAS-WM conform to USMC policy and allignes with SCS Financial Reporting requirements for gained and lost equipment.

Users
Adding this functionality will benefit the entire DPAS community.

Completed - Release 3.0 - 15 May 2015

Work orders (New Receipts/Before Maintenance) are being sent to Material Movement and M&U simultaneously. This creates the potential for there to be two move requests in the system at the same time for the same asset. One request being system generated going to the stowage location and one request being generated by M&U to move asset to a Maintenance Location. Work Orders should not populate the M&U module until Transportation updates the system showing the asset as being on a stowage location. Requestor - Van Weaver

Description
When updating a COSIS W/O with a status code of pending close and a state code of completed awaiting inspection, an error is received stating that a inspection status code is mandatory. This is not done in maintenance.

Recommended
The accepted or rejected status happens in Quality Control. This needs to be removed from M&U.

Mission Critical
Yes. These are mandatory fields for the M&U personnel but are not M&U functions.

Benefits
By implementing this change, the Maintenance supervisor will be able to update work orders with a pending, completed awaiting inspection status.

Users
All

Completed - Release 3.0 - 15 May 2015

Description
Non-standard returns, missing gear statements, custom (non-unit issue list) transactions are one at a time and are time consuming. This process needs to be improved. This is critical prior to DPAS implementation at Camp Lejeune and beyond. This comes down to clickology in the system. It is overly burdensome to process a large individual issue return, when there are many missing items, and other issues to deal with.

Recommended
It is requested that DPAS/LEIDOS provide the capability to process missing gear statements for all items listed on the missing gear statement in Mass, thereby reducing the number of key strokes involved in completing the process.

Mission Critical
Yes, this will significantly impact on our customer processing time. We cannot implement at Camp Lejuene and beyond without a smoother process in place.

Benefits
Implementing this design request will reduce users time for processing transactions and members wait time to receive their receipts.

Users
Yes, this will impact all of CSP DPAS users.

Completed - Release 3.0 - 15 May 2015

Description
OCS,TBS, SOI East/West classes provide rosters in advance to the IIF. All of OCS and 80 % of TBS students do not have CAC cards issued to them. At this time DPAS doesn't provide a way to upload these lists in a batch upload process. Each name has to be key punched one at a time.

Recommended
Adding a Batch upload process for OCS,TBS,SOI East/West class rosters.

Mission Critical
Yes, this is mission critical. With limited staff at OCS,TBS,SOI East/West IIF's it is critical to have a Batch upload process to save time.

Benefits
Reduces Time/Cost.

Users
Yes, this will impact 80% of CSP DPAS users.

Completed - Release 3.0 - 15 May 2015

Description
In the columns that are displayed in each DPAS menu screen, need to have column headers and left to right scroll bar freeze on screen when scrolling up and down.

Recommended
Freeze column Headers and all screens.

Mission Critical
Not mission Critical but would greatly enhance ability for the USER to know which column is which when looking at screens with more than 10 rows of data.

Benefits
Improves Accuracy when looking at screens with more than 10 rows of data.

Users
Yes, this will impact all of CSP DPAS users.

Completed - Release 3.0 - 15 May 2015

The statement that displays on inventory reports is currently set at the Agency Level. Navy recommends the authority be set at the UIC level which will permit UICs to manage the signature block to support their unique business rules. Currently any changes to the signature block will apply to all Accountable UIC/UICs through out navy. Customer priority: 4

This SCR is being presented to determine who may be interested in this functionality and how complex/automated/integrated the functionality should be within DPAS.? This was first discussed with SOCOM and they are developing a process document to provide DPAS, to permit an estimate. There is no method for a unit/non-DPAS user to send a request to DPAS for an asset and to track the approval of the request. Would like the system to be able to receive a request for an asset from a non-user.? The request would be reviewed to determine if the person/unit is authorized this equipment, there are funds available and what the priority of the issue would be.? Once approval has been granted at all levels the request would be sent to the warehouse organization for fulfillment.? The fulfillment processes already exists in the DPAS Warehouse so this would provide the front end of the ICP functions.

Completed/Removed per email from Mr. Stossel - 11 June 2021