Unlike submitted Support help tickets, System Change Requests (SCR's) can only be submitted through your organization's appointed and authorized ELMS CCB member representatives, or otherwise if no CCB representatives have yet been appointed, your Primary Information Owner appointee. If you are unsure of who your organization's appointed ELMS CCB member representatives or Primary IO are, you may email the ELMS Support team to request that information:
To learn more about the process, please visit our CCB Responsibilities and Meetings page. Below you will find all SCR's that have been submitted, and what their status is. To download a blank form, you may visit our Reference Library and download the SCR Form.
Utilize the search filters below to narrow your results by keywords, module, or state. You may also request an Excel file of all the SCR data by contacting the Help Desk.
| Found: 1807 Result(s) | Show: |
| Title |
ELMS Module |
Reporting Org |
State |
Description |
Action |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02114 | TFSMS to DPAS USMC Allowance Interface | PA,Warehouse,Materiel Management | Leidos | New | Change Request: New System Process Description:
USMC is transitioning their equipment inventory held for issue as well as the equipment in possession of the operating forces to use DPAS for the management of. USMC utilizes the Total Force Structure Management System "TFSMS" to manage their allowance. DPAS does not currently support an interface with TFSMS. It is a must have to support readiness reporting.
Recommended:
1. Develop the capability to inbound files that contain TFSMS Allowance data via DAAS GEX. 2. Import the TFSMS data and present it the USMC user community with the data along with the on-hand quantities to enable the operating forces and mgmt to know their state of readiness based upon equipment required to on hand.
3. This SCR likely applies to the Materiel Mgmt., Warehouse Mgmt. and Property Accountability, and Requisition service applications of DPAS Mission Critical:
The implementation of this SCR is in support of USMC's DPAS implementation of their operating forces. Benefits:
Enable USMC to determine their state of readiness as well as equipment overages / underages. Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This change impacts USMC users. |
|
| 02113 | Labor Hour Process Improvement | MU | USAF: FH-AFHAF | New | Change Request: Policy/Regulatory Description:
Labor hours are an analytical function to devise the overall cost during the life cycle of an equipment asset. Viewing multiple shops across the enterprise there are currently 1000s of work orders closed out without the maintenance team quantifying their labor. A recommended improvement would be to make it a mandatory field prior to closing out a work order. Previously in IMDS, it was a mandatory field.
Recommended:
Make it a mandatory field, where the user cannot close out any work-orders without submitting labor. This should be controlled at the maintenance program configuration where it can be turned on/off for at the site level only to alleviate concerns for agencies that may not require it in the same manner; where aviation support equipment would need it. Mission Critical:
PAD 22-02 signed by the Chief of Staff of the Air Force (CSAF) directs the centralized management of CAvSE at the enterprise level, residing within the 440 SCOS Aviation Support Equipment Management Flight. This change will allow for future data mining actions seeing equipment maintenance hours and for career fields who use the data from DPAS M&U for manpower studies to have accurate information to enable the force to have correct manpower based upon the actual workflow. 00-20-2 para 4.23, 4.26 requires labor documentation. Benefits:
This will enable the Air Force to achieve the desired effects in improving overall readiness and warfighter support by having accurate labor hour calculations across the enterprise. Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This change will be applicable to 15,000+ users assigned to Site FH-AFHAF, as well as other agencies or departments that conduct maintenance on their support equipment. |
|
| 02112 | Requisition Phase 2 PA Application | PA | Leidos | New | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
This SCR documents the development effort to implement the DPAS Requisition Service within the Property Accountability application. The initial implementation of the Requisition Service provided support to the DPAS Maintenance application (SCR 02035).
Recommended:
• Capability for PA users to submit MILSTRIP / DPAS Warehouse Requisitions. They can submit Requisitions to DPAS Warehouses and submit DLMS compliant orders to external Sources of Supplies. • Requisition Approval process that can be customized for the individual needs of a DPAS PA UIC. The initial Requisitions submitted will go through an Approval process to confirm they have the funding and authorization to submit these Requisitions
• Ability to view Requisition history
• Submit modification requests, cancellation requests, and followups.
• Support the establishment and maintenance of Fund Operating Targets.
• For DAI users, enable Operating Targets to be linked to the DAI Projects / Tasks .
• For DAI users, report commitment, obligations and receipts electronically to DAI.
Mission Critical:
The implementation of this SCR is in support users of the property accountability application that have a requirement to requisition items. This will streamline the effort. Benefits:
Streamline and standardize the requisitioning process for DPAS and its Property Accountability customers. It eliminates the need to create a Materiel Mgmt. application environment and maintain user accounts within. It will also provide electronic reporting of the commitment and obligations to DAI accounting system for customer that utilize that system for financial reporting. Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This change impacts the Air Force as well as other users of the Property Accountability application e.g. USMC. |
|
| 02111 | Include CAGE and Mfr Part Nbr data in views | Warehouse | ASAALT | New | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
The MFR Part number is not list of the DPAS grids and /or reports that are associated to inventory data. The stock number and specifically the AESIP stock number that is created for MANP records is not physically labeled on the equipment. Since this stock number is created by AESIP and can only been seen in DPAS the users had no way of easily referencing the equipment when the equipment is labeled by MFR part number.
Recommended:
Add the MFR part number(s), MFR name(s), and MFR CAGE(s) as optional data fields to be added to each grid search, grid data view and the reports such as the ICN report that relate to inventory information. These data fields should be optional and should be available for export when saving out a report. Mission Critical:
Provides the CAGE and Part Nbr of the actual item (real identifiers) to the user whereas the AESIP Stock Nbr represents the AESIP database row ky which has no relationship to the item. It also provides more informed information when the Mfr Part Nbr data is more than 15 characters (Stock Nbr max length). Benefits:
Provides the CAGE and Part Nbr of the actual item (real identifiers) to the user whereas the AESIP Stock Nbr represents the AESIP database row ky which has no relationship to the item. It also provides more informed information when the Mfr Part Nbr data is more than 15 characters (Stock Nbr max length). Frequency:
Daily
Users:
All users of the DPAS Warehouse Mgmt application. |
|
| 02110 | DD Form 1149 Warehouse Transfer form improvements | Warehouse | ASAALT | New | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
When performing a warehouse to warehouse transfer the DD1149 that is generated as a PDF states that the transfer is a "LOCAL DELIVERY". This is not alway the case. This text isn't easily remove or edited. When performing a warehouse to warehouse transfer the users needs to the option to populate the required data elements of the DD 1149. The user needs the option to populate this within DPAS so that the DD 1149 can be regenerated with all data elements at any time.
Recommended:
Please remove the words "LOCAL DELIVERY" from the DD 1149 that is generated when performing a warehouse to warehouse transfer. Mission Critical:
Improves the use of the DD Form 1149 for Warehouse transfers Benefits:
This request is mandatory to help the PEO be audit ready. This information should be easily accessible within the APSR. The users should not have to maintain addition shipping details information outside the application being used to document the shipping (transfer) transaction. Frequency:
Monthly
Users:
All DPAS users of the Warehouse Transfer process. |
|
| 02109 | Generate a Physical Inventory request upon receipt of a MRO denial | Materiel Management | Leidos | In Progress | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
When DPAS Materiel Mgmt. receives a denial response (DLMS 945A) from a RSA that was requested to perform an issue, DPAS sets the CR/DRO/RDO to "plan" for the item manager to take additional action. They have the option to deny, back order, DVD or issue a substitute. What the system is missing is the systematic generation of the request to conduct a physical inventory as a result of the denial.
Recommended:
1. When processing the MRO denial from the RSA, systematically schedule a physical inventory request to the RSA using the key data from the CR/DRO/RDO - Stock Nbr, Condition Code, Purpose Code, and Project Code. Mission Critical:
The implementation of this SCR is in support of USMC's DPAS implementation (Phase 1a). Benefits:
Provides all DPAS MM customers with the systematic generation of a Physical Inventory request for a MRO denial. The PI, once conducted will result in the warehouse locating the materiel or making the needed inventory adjustment(s). Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This change impacts all customers of Materiel Mgmt. and those users of the MRO within Warehouse Mgmt.
Partially Completed - Release 2025.1.5 |
|
| 02108 | Unit Issue Appt Edit Capability and Cancellation Job Updates | Warehouse | Leidos | New | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
DPAS currently does not update an existing appointment if you edit the unit issue request, requested date and time. For unit issue requests that require staging, the appointment immediately goes into an in-progress state, however an appointment date/time does not populate on the appointment grid. Once the appointment is in progress, it triggers a count down for the appointment cancel job. This issue was reported by CSP (Help Ticket 102384 / ADO 132620) during research and testing, it was determined that there were a couple of pieces of code that were missed.
Recommended:
The recommended solution that when a unit issue request appointment is created, start_dt_tm and end_dt_tm are set based off the requested date/time in the Unit Issue Request. This would create an Appointment Date/Time to populate in the appointment grid, which would let the appointment cancel job cancel appointments correctly. Mission Critical:
Will improve user functionality for unit issue appointments. The goal is for appointments to accurately receive for the service center. Benefits:
By improving the unit issue appointments process, it alleviates undue stress on custodians who currently receive email notification their appointments have been canceled. It also provides the service center with accurate appointment information for planning and staffing purposes. Frequency:
Daily
Users:
All members that use Unit Issue Request for Appointment processes. |
|
| 02107 | Incorporate FMS fields into Customer Requisition / Materiel Release Order | Warehouse,Materiel Management | Leidos | New | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
1. USMC requires the capability to issue materiel in support of the Security Assistance Program. There is a requirement to additional fields to track the issuance of this materiel and in some instances the cost could be different than the DOD Standard Price.
2. The price/cost used is to be the the security assistance agreement price.
2. This SCR incorporates additional fields into Customer Requisition in MM and Materiel Release Order in WM that identify the Security Assistance agreement number.Recommended:
1. Modify CR in MM to provide for the entry of additional Security Assistance data elements and the entry of the agreement price. 2. Modify DLMS 940R and DLMS 945A to enable data exchange of the additional fields / cost between MM/WM and WM/TMS.
3. Modify MRO in WM to display and/or the entry of additional Security Assistance fields.
4. Modify DLMS 856S Shipment Status to contain the additional fields.
5. Modify DD Form 1348 to display additional FMS field and the cost the government has approved for the item.
6. Modify MM In-transit tracking to contain the security assistance fields. Mission Critical:
Supports DLM 4000.25 Supports DLMS 940R, 945A, and 856S Implementation Conventions (ICs)
The implementation of this SCR is in support of USMC's DPAS implementation (Phase 1b).Benefits:
Provides all DPAS customers with the capability to perform manage Security Assistance issues. Frequency:
Weekly
Users:
This change impacts all customers of Materiel Mgmt. and those users of the MRO within Warehouse Mgmt. |
|
| 02106 | FAST Disposition Reason | MU | AF: VSCOS | New | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
Process disconnect within UIC to UIC transfers for FAST Reportable vehicles. System requires FAST Disposition Reason input during transfer, however, the PA and M&U transactions prevent the gaining and losing Maintenance Activity (MA) to complete action. The gaining MA can profile a transferred asset if there is not a work order open for the asset. Normal process is the gaining MA profiles and opens a work order processing asset into new UIC. However, this actions prevents the losing MA inputting a FAST Disposition Reason to drop the asset from losing MA causing asset to remain within AWD status in the losing MA. This presents data integrity issue during FAST reporting as MA cannot input FAST disposition reason.
Recommended:
Completing PA UIC to UIC transfers within specific site generates an automatic system action (i.e., M&U) to remove AWD status from losing Maintenance Activity (MA). System must automatically clear the FAST Disposition Reason with ‘N/A – Not Applicable; vehicle is not disposed’ and generate an Open Action (e.g., Homepage display) notifying losing MA asset is no longer within MA and system transferred asset to gaining MA is complete. Additionally, system must generate an Open Action to clear any FAST Disposition Reason for all FAST Reportable assets disposition within PA. Finally, add a column to M&U MAM Search Results for AWD status. This allows another search tool identifying assets are ready for FAST Disposition Reason after PA disposition other than UIC to UIC as this is automatic as recommended above. Mission Critical:
Department of the Air Force Instruction 24-302 VEHICLE MANAGEMENT, Section 8.4 Annual FAST Report Benefits:
Streamline UIC to UIC transfer process by automating some of the steps, while ensuring accurate FAST Reporting by informing maintenance activity that FAST Disposition Reasons are ready/require action. Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This process improvement benefits DOD agencies and military services on a daily basis. |
|
| 02105 | Work Plan Site Restriction | MU | AF | New | Change Request: Process Improvement Description:
DPAS flexibility searching and selecting Work Plans causes data integrity issues within DF-VEHS site. Currently, DPAS does not limit search results to within specific site(s) and wide-open searches present all DPAS Work Plans allowing user to select incorrect plan. While Work Plan may look similar, the differences drive data inconsistencies easily preventable with site specific work plans.
Recommended:
Limit Work Plans (public work plans) to owning site (i.e., DF-VEHS), or an option within Master Data/Maintenance Program restricting system to site specific Work Plans (e.g., toggle). A toggle or restriction will resolve data integrity isse with reference to Work Plans and eliminate Work Plan selection confusion for all sites utilizing DPAS M&U. Mission Critical:
Department of the Air Force Instruction 24-302 VEHICLE MANAGEMENT, Section 7C Vehicle & Equipment Work Order Benefits:
Significantly increase data accuracy and streamline user experience with work order creation process. Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This process improvement benefits DOD agencies and military services on a daily basis. |
Disclaimer | Accessibility
Please be advised that Navy Property Accountability module users will be unable to access ELMS during the period beginning 3pm EST on Tuesday September 29th, until 8am EST on Friday October 2nd due to the annual EOFY lockout period. If you have questions, please direct them to the Navy PP&E Management Support Office via their centralized email inbox, which is
Please be advised that ELMS will be unavailable beginning Friday, October 2nd at 9:00 pm EST for server maintenance. Estimated downtime is stated to last up to 60 minutes in length - please plan accordingly.