Description
Navy Weapons Division requires a new Role to be created to support the business process we require from the DPAS Warehouse Application

Recommended
Create a new role that limits the access to the application to specifically to processes that are needed to support our business process

Mission Critical
Mission Critical - creating a new role will reduce the training requirement for our users and reduce the unnecessary requirement to ignore unneeded processes

Benefits
Reduces Time and Cost associated with using the DPAS Warehouse application

Users
Only effects our users

Description
I have a Northrup Grumman contractor, Debbie Kassay who works for PMA 231.  Currently she has DPAS Stakeholder access, and needs Inventory Activity added to her role.  I have been working with DPAS Support to have Inventory Activity added to her and they suggested that I submit an SCR. 

Recommended
Have Inventory Activity added to Debbie Kassay Stakeholder role.

Mission Critical
Yes, with all of the mandated SECNAV Inventory requirements currently in place, Debbie Kassay cannot view the inventory activity required to do her job.

Benefits
Benefits of her getting access would improve financial accountability of tooling being issued to vendors out on contract.

Users
It would affect all users who have stakeholder access.

Completed – Release 2020.1.1 – 27 March 2020

Description
Require capability to create a supply requisition in M&U against a given job and serial number, and have requisition pass to ILS-S.
Require capability for ILS-S to process transaction and return appropriate status to M&U for documentation on job order and in history for that end-item.

Recommended
Create linkage/interface with ILS-S to accommodate parts requisitioning against a given job and serial number.

Mission Critical
This is mission critical.
The ability to seamlessly requisition parts is a critical component of maintaining Air Force wartime mission capability.
The lack of an interface requires maintainers/users to manually translate information between systems; increasing time-lines, likelihood of errors and potentially delaying sortie generation and the Air Force's ability to support wartime missions.
Maintaining requisition transactions in asset history provides crucial information to enable financial planning and fleet repair/replacement decision making.

Benefits
Improves status reporting accuracy of support equipment, Air Force readiness reporting, financial plans/budget reporting, and program management offices' fleet sustainment planning.

Users
This affects all M&U module users within the United States Air Force.

Partially Completed -- Release 2021.2 - 28 May 2021

Partially Completed - Release 2021.3 - 10 September 2021

Completed - Release 2021.4.2 - 28 January 2022

Description
Defense Property Accountability System (DPAS) and Army Serialization Business Rule Constraints.
A system business rule created to support the information exchange between the Army Enterprise Integration Program (AESIP) Army Equipment Materiel Master (AEMM)  and the DPAS Catalog is causing issues with managing items in DPAS for property accountability for serialized items; when data is fed from the AEMM (the Army's master catalog) to DPAS a record with a blank Serial Number Indicator (SNI) (necessary in support of AD 2016-21) the materiel is handled as bulk.
This is effecting users within both the ASA(ALT) and AMC communities. 

Recommended
For the Army customer, instead of the materiel being handled as bulk, the serialization field in DPAS (for items without a SNI) will allow PBOs to continue bringing the property to record with an edit capability and provide "recommended" serialization code in their local account catalog, with a report generated by DPAS so that the Army community can expedite the adjudication of these items.

Mission Critical
This is mission critical for audit and transparency. Instead of the materiel being handled as bulk, the serialization field in DPAS (for items without a SNI) will allow PBOs to continue bringing the property to record with an edit capability and provide "recommended" serialization code in their local account catalog.

Benefits
Adding the modification would reduce reprocessing time, improve accuracy, and accountability aligned to audit.  This would stream line items affecting Army logistics business processes.

Users
Yes.

Completed – Release 7.2.40 – 31 Jan 2020

Description
Currently the Disposition “Excess” process does not fully support DoD 4140.01 / DLMS processing for excess material being sent to DLA Disposition Services .

Recommended
Recommend the following requirements:

1. Produce an “Excess” formatted DD Fm 1348-1a and addendums, as necessary
2. Produce a DLMS 856S transaction for the Excess materiel that includes Shipment information (Mode of Shipment, Shipment Date, Shipment Nbr, SCAC, etc.)
3. When the materiel is updated to shipped, the system should be establishing an Intransit within Materiel Mgmt
4. Accept the 527R MRA from DLA to close the Intransit.
5. Work Flow Approval….

Mission Critical
Yes, having this functionality will make CSP audit compliant in the disposition excess process.

Benefits
Having this functionality will help the CSP be in compliance with the current Marine Corps Audit Readiness Program.

Users
Yes All.

Partially Completed – Release 2022.2.2 – 23 September 2022

Partially Completed - Release 2022.2.3 - 07 October 2022

Partially Completed – Release 2022.3.2 – 02 December 2022

Partially Completed – Release 2022.3.3 – 16 December 2022

Completed – Release 2023.2.3 – 05 May 2023

Description
With the evolution of DPAS capability, lease cost data will not be determined for GSA SIN as originally established. So during the MAM process, the association between Vehicle Type Cd and Vehicle Group Cd can be reduced to three selections.  Having all the previous selections confuses users trying to match old SINs to new vehicles.

Recommended
Update Vehicle Group Cd table to reflect only GSA Leased, Commercially Leased and Owned for each Vehicle Type Cd.

Mission Critical
Since the Vehicle Type Cd is the only data sent to FAST, I would not say it was mandated unless there are some background issues.  But it does increase time of MAM trying to match Type and Group Cds.

Benefits
Reduces time profiling and improves the accuracy of data.

Users
Only Fleet Operations.

Description
No report is available to provide data for items currently back-ordered.  Routine replacement orders may contain items back-ordered for specific customers.  There is currently no way to determine which items need to be earmarked for those members.

Recommended
Develop report that shows by all back-ordered items by member.

Mission Critical
Mission critical - items back-ordered for cadets cannot be issued to them upon receipt.

Benefits
Ability to support USAFA mission by ensuring back-ordered items are delivered to those waiting members.

Users
All

Description
No report is available to provide consumption data for items.  USAFA uses this data to re-order mandatory cadet items.  How many of each stock number (size of uniform item) sold within a period of time is necessary to ensure correct re-order.

Recommended
Develop report that shows by LIN/TAMCN / ITEM the quantities of items sold to cadets for a designated period of time.

Mission Critical
Mission critical - reorder cannot be successful without this information, cadets may not have mandatory uniform/training items available to complete their missions.

Benefits
Ability to re-order mandatory items accurately.

Users
All

Partially Completed – Release 2020.2 – 26 June 2020

Description
Calculation of Environmental and Disposal Liabilities (E&DL)

Recommended
See attached document

Mission Critical
E&DL reporting is mandated by SFFAS 6, TR-11, & FMR Vol 4, Chapter 13.

Benefits
DPAS will be the first APSR to implement E&DL for financial reporting purposes. This will save the department time, cost and effort in financial reporting of E&DL of assets within the financial statements.

Users
All Agencies are required to calculate and report E&DL

Description
During the past Audit Readiness Inspection for the CSP it was noted that extra Columns are needed to be added to the Inquiry>DLMS Transaction Inquiry Review area to make the CSP compliant with the current Marine Corps Audit Readiness policies and to help improve with the quarterly financial reporting requirements.

Recommended
To help with the CSP to be compliant with the current Marine Corps Audit Readiness program we are requesting that the Below columns be added to the following area Inquiry > DLMS Transaction Review:
Warehouse > Warehouse_from > To_Owning_DODAAC > From_Owning_DODAAC > From_Location_ID > To_Location_ID > Lst_Updtd_By > As_of_Dt_Tm > Document_Nbr > DIC > Serial_Nbr > Stock_Number > NIIN > Nomenclature > SAC > Type_Asset_Cd > To_Reason_Cd > Description > From_Qty > To_Qty > TOT_QTY > From_Condition_Cd > To_Condition_Cd > Unit_Price > Extended Price > Transaction_Type > Inv_Adj >
GL Account > Change_from_reason_desc > Recoverablity_code > TAMCN

Mission Critical
Yes, without these columns the CSP is forced to rely on multiple data pulls for financial reporting and we are not in compliance with the current Marine Corps Audit Readiness Program.

Benefits
Having this functionality will help the CSP be in compliance with the current Marine Corps Audit Readiness Program.

Users
Yes All.

Completed – Release 2021.1 – 5 February 2021